Enterprise RAG Pipeline
Secure Knowledge Retrieval Architecture
1. Concept & Problem Discovery
- The Problem: Generic LLMs hallucinate or provide outdated answers when queried about proprietary enterprise data. Fine-tuning models is too slow and cost-prohibitive for dynamic documentation.
- The User: Internal employees needing instant, accurate answers from proprietary knowledge bases.
- The Hypothesis: A Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline will ground the LLM's responses in internal company truth, reducing hallucination rates to near zero.
2. Product Requirements & Scoping (MVP)
- Core User Flow: The system searches the internal vector database, retrieves the top 3 most relevant context chunks, and forces the LLM to generate an answer only using those chunks.
- In Scope for V1: PDF and Markdown ingestion, semantic search retrieval, strict system prompting, and source citation.
- Out of Scope for V1: Real-time data syncing. V1 relies on batch ingestion to validate retrieval quality before scaling infrastructure complexity.
3. System Design & Architectural Trade-offs
- Chunking Strategy: Selected Semantic Chunking over Fixed-size. Fixed chunks destroy the semantic meaning of embeddings, degrading search relevance.
- Vector Database: Selected Local FAISS for the MVP. This ensured zero data leakage during prototyping by avoiding third-party cloud databases.
4. Execution & AI Guardrails
- Strict Prompt Engineering: The model is constrained to explicitly output "I do not have enough information" if the answer is not within the retrieved context.
- Citation Enforcement: Forced appending of file names and page numbers to every generated claim for human-in-the-loop verification.
5. Monitoring & Success Metrics
- Primary Metric (Quality): Hallucination Rate (Target: < 2%), measured using the RAGAS framework for Answer Faithfulness.
- Secondary Metric (Performance): Time to First Token (TTFT) < 1.5 seconds.